How many times have you heard that pork is bad for you? Or that pork
is dangerous? Avoiding pork for religious reasons is one thing but
avoiding pork simply because some "expert" decided to present a
one-sided view is something else. Let's bring a little science to the
discussion, shall we? Is Pork Really Bad For You? Today's
pork products are leaner and healthier than ever. A 3-ounce serving of
pork tenderloin has less than half the fat of a 3-ounce serving of
skinless chicken thigh. And pork is a good source of B-vitamins
and many minerals, too. That 3-ounce serving of pork contains over half
of your recommended daily allowance of thiamin and more than a third of
your RDA of vitamin B6 and Niacin. Pork is also a source of iron,
magnesium, phosphorous, zinc and vitamin B12. Pork & Parasites Like
all other meat products, pork carries a very real risk of parasitic
infection--especially if the meat is undercooked. Tapeworm and
trichinosis are just two of the parasitic infections often mentioned in
anti-pork literature. How common are tapeworm and trichinosis? In an article titled Deaths from Cysticercosis, United States,
researchers put the number of pork tapeworm cases in the years
1990-2002 at 221. The vast majority of these cases were of immigrants
who likely brought the infection with them. Only 33 of these cases
involved U.S.-born citizens. As for trichinosis, the numbers look
even better. More rigorous enforcement of the Swine Health Protection
Act has brought the incidence of trichinosis-positive pigs down to
0.1%. In fact, according to the CDC, most recent trichinosis cases in
the U.S. have been linked to the consumption of improperly cooked wild
game meat like bear--not commercially packaged pork. The truth
is, the organisms that pose a danger to pork eaters are easier to
destroy through proper cooking than salmonella, a bacterial infection
most commonly associated with eggs and poultry. Scientific Studies in Favor of Pork You
don't often hear about the "pros" of eating pork but more than a few
studies have found pork both safe and nutritious. One of the most
intriguing studies on pork was a 2007 study out of Spain. In this
study, conducted by the Galician Public Foundation for Heath
Emergencies, researchers found that frequent consumption of fresh meat
actually reduced the risk of lung cancer while consumption of
fish increased it. The reasons for these results are unknown but
results of this study are sure to spur on discussions for some time to
come. "But Pigs Don't Have Sweat Glands" One of
the most common arguments made about pork is that pigs are "dirty"
because they lack the ability to perspire. It's true. Pigs don't have
sweat glands. But neither do chickens. |